<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>BenCrowder.net - Latest Comments in Almost a thousand words</title><link>http://bencrowder.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bencrowder.disqus.com/almost_a_thousand_words/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:51:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Almost a thousand words</title><link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/04/almost-a-thousand-words/#comment-5429428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, Phixr also seems to suffer from the cluttered interface, and I don't think the separate-window-for-rotating sort of thing is very intuitive.  Pixoh's interface is nice, fun to use, and intuitive, even though it doesn't have a ton of features right now.  (And I think that not having a ton of features can definitely be a good thing.)  Not to mention the aesthetics -- Pixoh looks good; Phixr and PXN8 don't.  Sorry.  Those things matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:51:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Almost a thousand words</title><link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/04/almost-a-thousand-words/#comment-5429427</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://phixr.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="phixr.com"&gt;phixr.com&lt;/a&gt; also nice. It's photobucket support is essential for me. Also, pxn8 always displays ads right over the image on firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Almost a thousand words</title><link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/04/almost-a-thousand-words/#comment-5429426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um, that link doesn't work.  As for why I prefer Pixoh, its interface is cleaner and more enjoyable to work with.  PXN8 is cluttered, with not enough breathing room.  Simplicity is good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Almost a thousand words</title><link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/04/almost-a-thousand-words/#comment-5429425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;check out &lt;a href="http://eyspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="eyspot.com"&gt;eyspot.com&lt;/a&gt; - a pretty good video editor.&lt;br&gt;Ben I'd like to get a better idea of why you prefer pixoh to pxn8.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">walter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Almost a thousand words</title><link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/04/almost-a-thousand-words/#comment-5429424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure &lt;i&gt;someone's&lt;/i&gt; working on that. :)  But that just might prove to be the limit of Ajax web apps -- video editing is intense enough that it probably can't be done in a browser...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:37:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Almost a thousand words</title><link>http://bencrowder.net/blog/2006/04/almost-a-thousand-words/#comment-5429423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oooh!  Nice. Now only if there was one for editting video clips . . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:32:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>